Richard Holbroke, the director of the Global Business Coaltion on HIV/AIDS and former US ambassador to the UN, recently wrote an op-ed article in the Washington Post talking about how we are still losing AIDS Fight. I couldn't agree with him more.
Having spent more than two years now developing and running PTE, I am acutely aware to the sensitivities in the field for anyone to criticize the work of the nonprofit community. There is a perception that "we" in the nonprofit world can do no wrong, or at the very least, that any effort is a good effort, even if the results aren't that great.
The lack of accountability for nonprofit's is astounding. The amount of waste in terms of time and resources that I see, also astounding. The perception that a nonprofit organization means well, therefore is well is a drain on global resources.
I see the collective inability to critically analyze the work that the nonprofit community does as a byproduct of a fear of failure. No one really wants to accept the notion that a massive effort made in the name of "philanthropy" could ever be wrong. But as a whole, if we are afraid to fail, is it ever really possible to succeed?
A change of course in the way the world is responding to the HIV epidemic is still possible, the question that remains to be answered is whether global citizens, nonprofit leaders and philanthropists are able to take a critical look at what has transpired over the past 25 years and be able to stand tall and proud for the accomplishments made to date, but find the humility to realize that the path we are on now is not the right one.
Voices like Mr. Holbrooke's are powerful and his message right on, but it will take more than one or two people to make the changes necessary.
PTE strives to embody this kind of change in the work we do and the approach we take towards addressing the HIV epidemic, which certainly will not change the way the world responds, but we are at least doing our best to follow Gandhi's advice of "be the change you want to see in the world."
Here is the article:
Still Losing the AIDS Fight
By Richard Holbrooke
Tuesday, October 9, 2007; Page A17
On the day you read this column, an estimated 12,000 people worldwide will contract HIV. Ninety percent of them, about 10,800 people, will not learn they are infected until full-blown AIDS hits them — in 2015. Until then, those people will unintentionally spread the virus that lies silently within each of them.
But on Dec. 1, the 19th annual World AIDS Day, political leaders and international health officials will, once again, tell the world that although the fight is far from over, progress is being made. The fight is indeed far from over — but don't believe the second half of such statements.
It is heartening that more than 2 million HIV-positive people are on lifesaving antiretroviral drugs (ARVs), thanks to generous programs from the United States, the European Union, the Global Fund, the Gates and Clinton foundations, and others. Americans should take pride in the fact that, with official aid of over $13 billion since 2003, the United States has led the world in a manner that evokes generous programs of the past such as the Marshall Plan.
But real progress must be measured by the only criterion that ultimately matters: Is the number of people who are HIV-positive declining? The answer is a resounding no. The number of people infected each day still far outpaces the number of people going on treatment each day. Anthony Fauci, the famed director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases at the National Institutes of Health, has stated the case in dramatic terms. Speaking in July at an international conference, Fauci said: "For every one person that you put in therapy, six new people get infected. So we're losing that game." He went on to say, "Clearly, prevention must be addressed in a very forceful way."
As a strategy to defeat HIV-AIDS, focusing primarily on treatment will never succeed; it can only keep (some of the) people already infected alive, and then only as long as they take ARVs every day for the rest of their lives. (If they stop taking ARVs, even for a few days, their infection will probably become drug-resistant.)
The only way to reverse the spread of the human immunodeficiency virus is to focus on prevention. If ever an ounce of prevention was worth a pound of cure, this is the case, since HIV lives undetected in people for about eight years before it explodes into full-blown AIDS. Here's the problem: More than 90 percent of the world's HIV-positive people do not know their status and unintentionally spread the virus for those eight years — to their wives, lovers, people with whom they share dirty hypodermic needles, almost anyone.
With a vaccine apparently a decade or more away (another major clinical trial failure was announced last month) and a safe microbicide for women still eluding researchers, prevention needs immediate emphasis and far, far more resources. But most of those fighting HIV-AIDS — dedicated, hardworking people — are still reluctant to admit that current prevention strategies are failing. A viable prevention strategy would encompass education and counseling, free condoms, female empowerment, more male circumcision, and abstinence.
But none of this will work without widespread testing — highly confidential but highly encouraged (which can now be done with simple, cheap 15-minute tests). I have been criticized in the past by some in the international health community for advocating testing, on the grounds that it would violate people's privacy. This is, of course, not my intent: Confidentiality must be respected.
And attention must be paid when Dr. Fauci speaks. Along with former president Bill Clinton, he is one of the few who have publicly advocated vastly increased testing as part of a strategy to stop the spread of HIV. (Even in the United States, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, at least one in four Americans with HIV do not know they are infected.) In no other medical epidemic in modern history has detection been such a low priority. But because HIV is sexually transmitted, it still carries stigmas in much of the world, including, until fairly recently, the United States. Those with AIDS lose jobs, are thrown out of their families, are denied medical help and are left to die alone. These appalling but widespread reactions lie behind long-standing international guidelines that testing should be completely voluntary.
Here is my challenge to the international health community: This year, tell the truth on World AIDS Day. Admit that we are still losing. Advocate strategies that emphasize prevention and detection, based on the successful "opt-out" testing systems being tried in Botswana, Lesotho and Malawi. If current policies are not changed, we will face uncontrollable growth in the costs of treatment of the victims of a disease that should be, as Bill Clinton has said, completely preventable.
Richard Holbrooke, president of theGlobal Business Coalition on HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria, writes a monthly column for The Post.
get newsletter 
contact 
Justice Edwin Cameron, a South African High Court Judge and renowned AIDS activist left China today after a week-long visit to China. Justice Cameron was infected with HIV in 1985, and in 1999 became the first senior South African official to state publicly that he was living with HIV. Since then, he has visited many countries to spread the message that HIV is a medically manageable disease and not a death sentence, and that fighting stigma and discrimination is key to fighting the disease. 
